DECLARATORY JUDGMENT INDEPENDENT OF
DAMAGES CAUSED BY BREACH OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION.
DAMAGES CAUSED BY BREACH OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION.
Different types of lawsuits may be brought relating to a
contract. A suit seeking damages for breach is not the only variety.
"A person interested under a . . . written contract. .
. may have determined any question of construction or validity arising under
the . . . contract . . . and obtain a declaration of rights, status, or other
legal relations thereunder." TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §
37.004(a) (Vernon 2008). "A contract may be construed either before or
after there has been a breach." Id. § 37.004(b).
Accordingly, a person can bring a declaratory judgment
action following a breach of contract and have the rights under the contract
declared. While such an action has much in common with a breach of contract
action, they are distinct from each other. Specifically, a declaratory judgment
action has the effect of determining liability without awarding damages, while
a breach of contract action seeks both a determination of liability and an
award of damages. See Intercontinental Group P'ship v. K.B. Home Lone Star,
L.P., 295 S.W.3d 650, 660-61 (Tex. 2009).
"Further relief based on a declaratory judgment or
decree may be granted whenever necessary or proper." TEX. CIV. PRAC. &
REM. CODE ANN. § 37.011 (emphasis added). "Necessary or proper" is
disjunctive, not conjunctive. Additionally, the further relief available is not
limited only to actions necessary to enforce the judgment. Instead, further
relief is available for anything that "serve[s] to effectuate the
underlying judgment." State v. Anderson Courier Service, 222 S.W.3d 62, 65
(Tex. App.-Austin 2005, pet. denied).
When a case is remanded for further proceedings, res
judicata does not apply at all because there is no second action. Jay
Petroleum, L.L.C. v. EOG Resources, Inc., 332 S.W.3d 534, 540 (Tex.
App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied). Further relief sought under
section 37.011 is not limited to claims brought in the same cause. Valley Oil,
499 S.W.2d at 336. Instead, it "may be sought in the same proceeding or in
a later proceeding." Lakeside Realty, 202 S.W.3d at 191.
SOURCE: HOUSTON COURT OF APPEALS – No. 01-11-00650-CV – 1/24/2013
– CBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Potter
No comments:
Post a Comment